首页> 外文OA文献 >Social Justice and the Myth of Fairness: A Communal Defense of Affirmative Action
【2h】

Social Justice and the Myth of Fairness: A Communal Defense of Affirmative Action

机译:社会正义与公平神话:平权行动的共同捍卫

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Article shall examine the characteristics of the current analytical framework by first examining some harmful effects resulting from the prioritization of fairness: excessive generalization, formalism and superficiality, and materialism. The Article will then examine in detail the Supreme Court\u27s resolution of modern affirmative action issues. The Court has generated confusion and discord by applying simplistic concepts to complex problems and by adhering to the primacy of fairness in a context in which all interested parties claim that fairness favors their result. Finally, this Article will critique the Court\u27s inability to provide a consistent doctrinal basis for discussing affirmative action issues and will propose a framework for the resolution of affirmative action issues based on a societal dedication to implement communal values. Although a vibrant community must frequently redefine and reassess its values, the moral and philosophical traditions of American society provide a foundation for the shared understanding of these values. Such commonality is essential for any group that considers itself a community. Such a communal value system will also restore trust - trust in others and trust in government. The primacy of fairness is, in many ways, the product of a society that has lost faith in trust.
机译:本条应通过首先检查由优先考虑公平性引起的一些有害影响来研究当前分析框架的特征:过度概括,形式主义和肤浅以及唯物主义。然后,本条将详细研究最高法院对现代平权行动问题的解决方案。法院通过对复杂的问题采用简单化的概念,并在所有有关当事方都声称公平有利于其结果的情况下坚持公平至上的原则,引起了混乱和不和。最后,本条将批评法院无法为讨论平权行动问题提供一致的理论基础,并将基于社会奉献的实现社区价值观的精神,提出解决平权行动问题的框架。尽管充满活力的社区必须经常重新定义和重新评估其价值观,但美国社会的道德和哲学传统为共同理解这些价值观提供了基础。这种共通性对于任何将自己视为社区的群体都是必不可少的。这种公共价值体系还将恢复信任-对他人的信任和对政府的信任。在许多方面,公平至上是失去信任的社会的产物。

著录项

  • 作者

    Closius, Phillip J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1995
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号